Feed on
Posts
Comments

A BOOK that gives detailed advice on suicide, including a recipe for cyanide, has been cleared for publication in Australia.

Author Dr Philip Nitschke has now ordered a print run in Australia after the Office of Film and Literature Classification’s board voted to allow the book to be sold in book stores wrapped in plastic as a category-one publication only for those over 18.

The book, called The Peaceful Pill Handbook, offers advice and suicide tips, describing in detail a variety of suicide methods.

Approval of the book has been condemned as promoting suicide as a viable choice not just for the sick and elderly but also for troubled adolescents.

Co-written by Dr Nitschke and Fiona Stewart, the book describes how to clean up after a suicide and remove evidence. He said he now planned for the book to be in stores by next month.

The decision to allow the book to be sold under the category-one classification was made despite objections of some board members who believed it should be banned under the anti-suicide-promotion laws.

At 11 am Pacific time, 24 December 2006, the paperback 3rd edition of ‘Final Exit: The Practicalities of Self-Deliverance and Assisted Suicide for the Dying” by Derek Humphry stood in the Amazon.com sales ranking at # 5,573 out of two million titles on sale through that source.

It has been on sale since l991, when it was a New York Times bestseller.

Quote: “Amazon.com Sales Rank: #5,573 in Books”

FOOTNOTE: Then by 28 December 06 this book had further risen in the Amazon sales chart to #4,954.

Italy’s Roman Catholic Church has denied the right to a religious funeral to a terminally ill man whose fight to die sparked a fierce euthanasia debate. Piergiorgio Welby died in Rome on Wednesday when a doctor turned off his life support machine at his request.

Church officials said they could not grant the request of the Welby family for a funeral in his local parish. They said Mr Welby had gone against Catholic teaching by expressing a desire to end his life.

“Welby had repeatedly and publicly affirmed his desire to end his own life, which is against Catholic doctrine,” a Church statement said.

Mr Welby, 60, was paralysed by muscular dystrophy and his condition had worsened in recent weeks. His plea for euthanasia – illegal in mainly Roman Catholic Italy – sparked a landmark court case and fierce debate.

But Father Marco Fibbi, a spokesman for the Rome vicar’s office, said that the decision not to allow a religious funeral would send a clear signal to Catholic believers that Mr Welby’s actions were not acceptable.

The doctor who turned off the life support machine has denied that his act constitutes illegal euthanasia. Dr Mario Riccio said he had fulfilled the patient’s legal right to refuse treatment.

About Piergiorgio WELBY

Piergiorgio WELBY, an Italian citizen suffering from muscular dystrophy, has taken upon himself to open the public debate on an individual’s right to choose the time of his/her death.

He mustered his very last resources to defend this right which ought to be a prerogative of any person afflicted with an incurable disease who endures a suffering that only he/she is in a position to judge tolerable or not.

So far, such freedom of choice is officially recognized only in the Netherlands, Belgium, Switzerland and in the State of Oregon.

It is also fitting to acknowledge the gallantry of Dr. Mario Riccio, the physician who listened to Mr.Welby and complied with his request to stop the treatment. Mr.Welby is now free from the prison of his own body. He has joined forces with Diane Pretty (U.K.), Ramon Sampedro (Spain), Jean-Marie Lorand (Belgium) and Vincent Humbert (France), each one of whom were gallant contributors to this crucial debate on human rights.

The ball is now in the Italian legislators’ park : indeed, Piergiorgio WELBY’s case points a finger at the absurdity of the present situation. May Italy update its laws. Let those whose lives are so severely curtailed that they do not wish to prolong it onto a cruel death.

—Elke BAEZNER and Jacqueline HERREMANS

President of Right to Die Europe and President of the World Federation of Right to Die Societies respectively 22 December 2006

The Nov/Dec 2006 issue of ‘Deliverance’, the newsletter of Exit International in Australia, leads off with the following report:-

“First Peaceful Pill Assay Renders Results.

“In October, the first chemical analysis results of the Peanut Project’s Peaceful Pill were obtained. The group had succeeded in producing significant quantities of barbiturates, the dominant component being Pentobarbital.

“Assay of the liquid submitted revealed 80mg/ml pentobarbital sodium (8gm in 100ml). If 100ml of this synthesized liquid were drunk, it would provide a reliable peaceful death.

“Despite several major setbacks and time delays, the initial group is now able to complete the project with confidence, and Exit is increasingly optimistic about the Peanut Project’s future. There is now a confident expectation that a second Peanut Project will begin early in 2007 as the handover of equipment and chemicals from the first group takes place.

“While the Pill is not expected to be used by any of the group in the immediate future, several seriously ill Exit members have indicated that it is likely that the pill will be used in 2007.”

Dr Jack Kevorkian will be paroled,says the Detroit News

Convicted suicide doctor Jack Kevorkian will be paroled on June 1, state officials and his lawyer confirmed today.

Mayer (Mike) Morganroth, Kevorkian’s Southfield attorney, said a three-member parole board panel unanimously granted Kevorkian parole after a hearing at Lakeland Correctional Facility in Coldwater last Thursday.

“He’s very pleased, he’s hoping it will be expedited,” Morganroth said.

Morganroth said he will push Gov. Jennifer Granholm to accelerate Kevorkian’s release date because of his poor health.

Kevorkian, who will be 79 in April and will have served more than eight years in prison by June 1, has diabetes, heart problems and a variety of other ailments.

He was convicted of second-degree murder for assisting a chronically ill patient who wanted to die.

More support for euthanasia.

The number of Italians who approve of euthanasia is rising, according to the 40th annual report on the social situation of Italy by Censis (Centro Studi Investimenti Sociali), published at the beginning of December.

Now 57 per cent of Italians feel that patients with incurable diseases, or close family members of those patients, have the right to ask for the interruption of medical treatment, as against 50 per cent in 2003. 43 per cent still remain insistent that all possible should be done to prolong the patients’ lives.

As to abortion, 59.8 per cent of Italian women maintain that they should have the right to abortion on demand.

What do you call death and an assisted death?

By Derek Humphry

Recent controversy in Oregon about the best term to describe how a doctor helps a terminally ill person to die under the Oregon Death With Dignity Act (1994) set me thinking about all the terms we use to describe ways of dying and death.

The row in Oregon is between people on the ‘choice’ side who abhor words like suicide, euthanasia, and even hemlock, while on the ‘pro-life’ side they want the foregoing words to be clearly spelled out because they think it helps draw attention to their opposing case. They want the stigma of the word ‘suicide’ to be kept for political reasons.

Since the hastened death law became operative in 1998, the Oregon Department of Human Services (DHS) has always used the term ‘physician-assisted suicide‘ in its annual reports on when and how the law is used. All medical and academic journals use the same term.

Journalists and broadcasters bluntly refer to the Oregon law either as ‘suicide’ or ‘assisted suicide’ – rarely mentioning that only a licensed physician can do this, and after observing a number of rules.

Oregon is the only place in North America where a physician, obeying certain obligatory guidelines, can prescribe a lethal overdose for a dying patient who requests this and chooses to drink it. Belgium, the Netherlands, and Switzerland permit similar help with death but do not have the same trouble with what to call it.

After vacillating about whether to call the procedure ‘physician-assisted death’ – and meeting lots of criticism from the right-to-life forces that this could mean any number of things – the DHS plumped for the innocuous term “Death With Dignity.”

But the flaw is that this also is a term which could mean different things to different people. ‘Death With Dignity’ could mean an overdose of lethal drugs to one person, yet to another it could mean dying whilst thinking of Christ’s suffering on the cross. It’s the ultimate euphemism!

For the past eight years, the annual reports by the Oregon agency showing how the law has been working have been a goldmine to those who want to see how such an unusual law plays out. A spade was called a spade. But now, in upcoming reports, we have to wonder what the umbrella phrase ‘death with dignity’ really means.

I think the DHS should stick with ‘physician-assisted suicide’ – describing an action precisely. With the words ‘physician-assisted’ in front, the humanitarian manner of the suicide – and its lawfulness – is apparent to most people. Clearly it is not a sad, depressive suicide because only a competent, dying adult can get this sort of help from a doctor in Oregon. Provided the word ‘suicide’ is qualified with ‘physician-assisted’ in front, the public is well able to tell the difference between the justifiable and the tragic.

To wrap up our support for physician-assisted suicide in fancy language invites our critics to say that we are trying to change the law covertly and that we are ashamed of being frank about what we really want, neither of which is true.

Probably this debate is not over, so I offer a list of alternative terms for justifiable help in dying or for a chosen death, plus the euphemisms we use for death itself:

For when a doctor prescribes a lethal overdose which the dying patient chooses to drink (11 terms): Physician-assisted suicide; Physician-assisted death; Physician-assisted dying; Physician-hastened death; Death With Dignity; Aid in Dying; Medically-assisted dying; Medicide (Kevorkian MD book); Physician-managed death; Mercy killing. Terminal sedation.

For when a sick patient chooses to end his or her own life without medical help (14): Self-deliverance; Patient-directed dying (Preston MD book); Humane self-chosen death; Auto-euthanasia; Rational suicide; Hastened death; Right to choose to die; Choice in dying; Self-determination; Suicide; Assisted suicide; Final Exit (Humphry book); Managed death; Self-destruction.

Western society has long had its favorite euphemisms for avoiding expressing such an ultimate action as death. This Orwellian double-speak seems to have similar overtones to the Oregon debate. We seem to want to distance ourselves from the reality of the loss, making it abstract, applicable to others and not ourselves.

Common euphemisms to avoid saying “dead” (16): Passed away; Passed on; Gone to a better place; Departed; Gone to meet the Maker; Gone to meet the majority; Gone to the world of light; Gone to Davy Jones’s locker; Crossed to the other side; Gone to sleep with the fishes; Quietly slipped from our embrace; Succumbed; Called home; Got her/his final reward; Expired; Dearly departed.

The criminal world has its own set of avoidances of the reality of death such as: whacked, smoked, wasted, rubbed out, deep sixed and given cement overshoes.

Finally, there’s the humorous and sardonic: croaked, gave up the ghost, put on the wooden overcoat, total goner, kicked the bucket, dead as a doornail, snuffed it, bit the dust, bought the farm, flat-lined, dead as a doornail, is pushing up daisies.

© copyright 2006 Derek Humphry derekhumphry@starband.net

Derek Humphry, who was a reporter for the London Sunday Times l966-80, is the author of the bestseller ‘Final Exit’ available in English, Spanish and Italian. — Updated 22 November 2006

You can find some interesting articles on this subject at this constantly-changing website:

ERGO: www.assistedsuicide.org

There are now two books on sale with remarkably similar and confusing titles:

“Final Exits
” and “Final Exit”

But the subtitles should clarify that one is about the results of all manners of death, while the second is about achieving voluntary euthanasia and assisted suicide:

“Final Exits
: The Illustrated Encyclopedia of How We Die” by Michael Largo (HarperCollins) 2006.

“Final Exit: The Practicalities of Self-Deliverance and Assisted Suicide for the Dying” by Derek Humphry (Dell) 1991-on

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »