Feed on
Posts
Comments

As a flashback to what was happening in our movement 22 years ago, there is an interesting story from the New York Times files of 20 June 1993 at this web site:

http://www.nytimes.com/1993/06/20/us/at-aids-epicenter-seeking-swift-sure-death.html

Jane Gross still writes for the NY Times and is the author of the book
Jane Brody’s Guide to the Great Beyond” (Random House 2009)

Click here:
http://www.nytimes.com/1993/06/20/us/at-aids-epicenter-seeking-swift-sure-death.html

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

A San Francisco Superior Court judge Friday upheld the enforcement of California laws dating back 141 years barring physician-assisted suicide after hearing arguments in a lawsuit filed by several terminally ill patients.

Several plaintiffs including Christy O’Donnell and her Bay Area doctor, Robert Brody, brought the San Francisco lawsuit asking that doctors be allowed to provide such treatment to patients who are mentally competent without fear of prosecution.

O’Donnell, who was in the courtroom Friday, cried openly outside the courtroom after Judge Ernest Goldsmith made his decision, but said she doesn’t want her tears to be misinterpreted as hopelessness.

“I am not hopeless,” said O’Donnell, a mother and former police officer and civil rights attorney who has been diagnosed with terminal cancer. She added that she is even more confident now that the law will change in California.

She said she doesn’t want other terminally-ill patients to be forced to endure slow, painful deaths while their families watch.

Defending the law, California Attorney General Kamala Harris’ office wrote in recent court papers, “California law prohibits Continue Reading »

Tags: , , , , , , ,

The Summer 2015 edition of the newsletter of the Final Exit Network is now available at these two sites:

Click to access FEN_Sum_2015.pdf

http://flash-pub.com/pub/ebooks/e3a29f2454/index.php

Tags: , , , , , ,

The New Mexico Court of Appeals has struck down a prior Bernalillo County District Court ruling that essentially allowed assisted suicide in the state.

In a split decision, a majority of the court concluded “that aid in dying is not a fundamental liberty interest under the New Mexico Constitution.”

A District Court judge previously ruled that a 1963 state statute making assisted suicide a fourth-degree felony in the state was invalid as applied to physicians who administer a lethal dose of medication to a terminally ill patient.

In a 142-page ruling, the Court of Appeals also instructed district courts to stop proceedings in further assisted suicide and right-to-die cases.

The original case surrounded two University of New Mexico doctors who had previously worked with assisted suicide patients who were terminally ill and mentally competent and who wished to help a patient end her life. The right-to-die issue began with Aja Riggs, a 50-year-old Santa Fe woman battling an aggressive uterine cancer with a prognosis that her time to live was limited.

The American Civil Liberties Union got behind the case and argued that doctors should be legally allowed to assist terminally ill patients to commit suicide and the decision should be between the doctor and patient.

Riggs joined two doctors in filing the lawsuit that made its way to the state’s 2nd Judicial District Court in Albuquerque and prompted a ruling in January 2014 by Judge Nan G. Nash that terminally ill patients do have the right to aid in dying and that “such deaths are not considered ‘suicide’ under New Mexico’s Assisted Suicide Statute.”

“This court cannot envision a right more fundamental, more private or more integral to the liberty, safety and happiness of a New Mexican than the right of a competent, terminally ill patient to choose aid in dying,” Nash wrote in the ruling last year.

That cleared the way for such patients to seek their doctors’ help in getting prescription medication if they want to end their lives.

The New Mexico Attorney General’s Office argued that the question of whether right-to-die should be allowed in the state should be left up to the Legislature. The Court of Appeals heard arguments in January regarding the case.

Laura Schauer Ives, an attorney for Riggs and the two doctors, said after Tuesday’s ruling that she now plans to appeal the case to the state Supreme Court. (AP Report)

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Worth out of interest in how his machine is meant to work looking at the London Daily Mirror reporting, with pictures, of DESTINY, Dr Philip Nitscke’s latest development of his self-deliverance machine. Copy URl and paste to go

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/mirror-reporter-meets-dr-death-6225236

There is an interesting video showing on the pages of The Guardian
newspaper today in London:

Title:
Dr Death Does Comedy, but will humour be the victim? – video

It can be seen at this URL site:

http://www.theguardian.com/society/video/2015/aug/03/dr-death-does-comedy-assisted-suicide-video

Tags: , , , ,

Right-to-die equipment called “Delivery”
Take a look at this web site in The Independent newspaper in London 21 July for very interesting new equipment for self-deliverance from Dr.Philip Nitschke, of Exit International:

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/dr-deaths-edinburgh-fringe-show-will-see-righttodie-campaigner-gas-audience-members-10405392.html

Impressive, but the legalities of using it, or supplying the equipment, to dying people are problematic. Let’s work them out.

Tags: , , , , ,

An attempt to overturn the UK law on assisted suicide and voluntary euthanasia by appealing to the European Court of Human Rights has failed.

The Strasbourg court has rejected as inadmissable applications by Jane Nicklinson, whose husband Tony suffered from locked-in syndrome, and Paul Lamb, who was paralysed following a car crash.

Lawyers for both campaigners had argued that those who wished to end their lives but were unable to do so should be able to seek assistance to do so without the nurse or doctor being criminalised.

Assisted suicide is prohibited by section 2(1) of the Suicide Act 1961 and voluntary euthanasia is considered to be murder under UK law.

The seven-judge panel on the ECHR unanimously dismissed Mrs Nicklinson’s claim on the grounds that it was for the national parliament to decide on such a sensitive issue. (Report by The Guardian, London)

Tags: , , , ,

INQUIRY
Unfortunately I missed the warning about the change in helium tanks that will now include oxygen. I have been unable to find any “old” tanks locally and am hesitant to take the chance ordering online at this late date.

1) Has anyone had success with buying a tank from an industrial supplier of helium?

CyberWeld in Linden, New Jersey, is a source. Look it up on internet.
On the main drag of most cities there are shops selling
inert gases; AIRGAS is one such; look for ‘welding’
companies because they sell pure helium and nitrogen.
Consult the pamphlet ‘How to make your own inert gas
hood’ at www.finalexit.org/erg-store

2) Has anyone attempted to rent a tank from a local supplier and then just not return it and forfeit the deposit? I have a local supplier that rents a tank -100% helium -that will fill 25 balloons (haven’t called to determine the tank size) for $22.50 plus $100 deposit or a 50 balloon tank for $45 plus deposit.
It would be an expensive way to obtain helium — but……

Diane H…., Sonoma County

Send answers to ergo@finalexit.org

Tags: , , , , , , ,

A Baltimore Circuit Court judge denied Dr.Lawrence Egbert’s request to reinstate his medical license Thursday, but not before expressing some sympathy for the right-to-die advocate linked to six deaths in Maryland.

Judge Marcus Z. Shar explained to Egbert, who represented himself in court, that his powers to review the case were limited. After finding that Egbert held the hands of six Marylanders as they asphyxiated themselves with helium, the Maryland Board of Physicians stripped Egbert of his license in December. He appealed the decision in January.

“I do not question this was done by you altruistically, out of concern and compassion for these patients,” Shar said. “That is not the issue before me.”

Shar upheld the board’s decision that Egbert was acting within his role as a physician when he advised and assisted those who wanted to commit suicide, and that he acted unprofessionally, against medical ethics and state law.

Egbert repeated defenses that he and his former colleagues in the group the Final Exit Network were relieving the pain of people who suffered for years and wanted to end their lives on their own terms. Though Maryland regulators found he acted unprofessionally when he removed suicide paraphernalia from the scene of the deaths, Egbert said he only did so at the requests of patients concerned about the stigma of suicide.

“We were doing what physicians ought to be doing, and are not doing,” Egbert told Shar.

Shar said he could not reverse the board’s decision if he found that a “reasonable person would find as they did.”

“It may very well be that soon the world will catch up with this, or Maryland will catch up with this,” Shar said. “At this point, it has not.”

Tags: , , , , , , ,

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »